Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > This is correct. I was just pointing out (though, admittedly, not very > clearly) that the final part of the next sentence in the manual, > "sometimes it is convenient to put them into a comment line", isn't.
It might be worth making the manual clear, so users know what's happening, and what is worth pursuing and avoiding. > At the moment, "<<tag>>" and "# <<tag>>" produce, respectively, "<a > name="tag" id="tag">tag</a>" and "<a name="tag" id="tag"></a>". > In a not so distant future "<<tag>>" will produce "<a name="tag" > id="tag"></a>" and "# <<tag>>" will be ignored. And one will be able to use <<tag>> anywhere, would it be at the beginning of a header of sentence. That would solve all my problems! So I'm eagerly awaiting for that "a not so distant future" to turn into "a recent past" :-). Thanks for the clarification. > I hope this is clearer now. In this message, yes. In the manual, not yet! François
