>>>> Won't it look odd and confusing to a reader, when there are two >>>> different footnote definitions with the same number. >>> >>> yes i agree that would be very confusing. but why, pray tell, would >>> there be two different definitions with the same number? >> >> <a>you haven't modified the description have you?</a> > > no, i haven't. also, you could look at the patch. the code is pretty > self-explanatory.
It was not a question. It was a suggestion. Btw, I will not be the one integrating or reviewing this patch. --
