Hi Suhail, I have accepted the patch. I added a TINYCHANGE cookie at the end of the git commit message: this is requested for tiny changes made by people who did not sign the FSF papers.
Suhail Shergill <suhailsherg...@gmail.com> writes: > *if* this patch makes sense, i'm willing to submit a patch for > org-e-html.el. The patch makes sense but is still a bit hackish. I accepted it because the functionality is useful in some cases and because it only affects org-html.el, which days are counted. > does anyone have any views? My view is that org-e-html.el should also make sure that we always have unique ids for all the footnotes of the current files, even when we export only part of it. This is not a trivial change though, because org-export.el has to change the way it retrieves the footnote number. Can you have a look at this? > does this patch 'make sense', and is this the right place for it? Yes, it is the right place for such patches. Thanks, -- Bastien
