Hello,
"Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7...@public.gmane.org> writes: > Andreas Leha wrote: >> it seems to me, that #+call lines in subtrees with the :noexport: tag >> are evaluated. Is this intended? > > I think that, at least, it's not a bug. I don't /think/ it has never been > specified like that. But I still don't have a clear view of what is done, in > which order: > > - processing macros > - inhibiting "noexport" subtrees > - evaluating code blocks (possibly with noweb calls) > - etc. As far as the new exporter goes (you may want to have a look at `org-export-as' function), the order is: - Process macros. - Expand #+INCLUDE: keywords. - Evaluate code blocks. Note that "noexport" sub-trees are not inhibited. The are just skipped when the parse tree is processed. To answer the OP, :noexport: tag is related to export, not to src-blocks. There are already other ways to disable code evaluation on subtrees. It may be useful, as in your case, to have their behaviour linked, but again, sometimes not. It's often better to keep separate things, well, separate. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
