Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > Hello, > > "Sebastien Vauban" > <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: > >> Andreas Leha wrote: >>> it seems to me, that #+call lines in subtrees with the :noexport: tag >>> are evaluated. Is this intended? > > As far as the new exporter goes (you may want to have a look at > `org-export-as' function), the order is: > > - Process macros. > - Expand #+INCLUDE: keywords. > - Evaluate code blocks. > > Note that "noexport" sub-trees are not inhibited. The are just skipped > when the parse tree is processed. > > To answer the OP, :noexport: tag is related to export, not to > src-blocks. There are already other ways to disable code evaluation on > subtrees. It may be useful, as in your case, to have their behaviour > linked, but again, sometimes not. > > It's often better to keep separate things, well, separate.
My expectation still is the "linked" case, but I can live in the unlinked org mode world. Thanks for the clarification, anyway. Regards, Andreas
