Dear Jambunathan, Again, thanks a lot for all your feedback.
On 3 Dec 2012, at 06:01, Jambunathan K wrote: > Torsten Anders <torsten.and...@beds.ac.uk> writes: >> One is the standard Emacs (in my case Aquamacs based on GNU Emacs >> 23.3.50.1) > > 50 in your Emacs version is an indication that it is a pre-pretest > version of Emacs. It seems you are OK with runnning a > non-released/unstable Emacs. This is the latest version of Aquamacs (http://aquamacs.org/), version 2.4. On a Mac, Aquamacs is by far the most convenient Emacs implementation I know of, if only for the antialiased font support and how easily font sizes are changed. The development version of Aquamacs uses Emacs 24, but I would like to avoid using that Aquamacs version before it is stable. Anyway, I assume I am not the only Aquamacs user on this list :) So, if the reported problem is due to Aquamacs then quite likely I am not the only one with this problem. I will go through your detailed list of suggestions a bit later. Thanks a lot again for your help! Best wishes, Torsten > I am not sure whether the port below is an Aquamacs. > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-11/msg00472.html > > It is Emacs 24.2.90. One major version up and also a pre-test. You can > read the reaction of people in that thread. That version has a fairly > recent version of all org files. Notably an old org-compat that is > /very close/ to new org-compat. If the new port works, then you really > don't have to bother but just carry on with your work and bother less > about Org. > -- -- Dr Torsten Anders Course Leader, Music Technology University of Bedfordshire Park Square, Room A315 http://www.torsten-anders.de