Michael, Did a little research on Colemak: appears to be (1) as or even slightly more ergonomic than Dvorak, in terms of measurable results; and (2) designed for QWERTY users.
That said, were you a QWERTY user before you transitioned into Colemak? . . . Does anyone here type Russian characters? I've started learning how to type the alphabet using Cyrillic stickers on my keyboard, and it /seems/ to be more ergonomically organized -- but perhaps that is just because I'm systematically learning it, rather than intuitively, and over many years, as I did with English QWERTY. 2013/3/2 Michael Brand <michael.ch.br...@gmail.com> > Hi John > > On Feb 21, 2013 10:16 PM, "42 147" <aeus...@gmail.com> wrote: > > [continues off-topic] > > > > > Have you tried a Dvorak keyboard? > > > > A friend of mine ridicules me for being a QWERTY typist, but I have found > > no empirical evidence that it is actually superior. At best, it has been > > proven, in /some/ studies, to be /slightly/ superior; and from a > > cost-benefit standpoint, /slight/ superiority according to /some/ studies > > (and I should add, only at extreme speeds), is not worth relearning how > to > > type. > > Colemak is a much better keyboard layout than Dvorak. I have been using > Colemak for many years now with great pleasure. > > Michael >
