Hello Eric, The posted solution works. But the issue is that I have to do this a lot of times for selective code chunks in multiple documents. Writing the sexp each time is not very elegant. Besides, if I were to come up with some solution than I did not want it to break anything else. Perhaps my question is still ambiguous and the right question should be does value of ":results" plist overrride the one from ":exports", i.e., is there any precedence order to the chunk options that is implicit, that i have not yet grasped from the documentation?
Thanks for your patience and help. Regards, Shripad. Shripad Tucson, AZ On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com>wrote: > shripad sinari <shripad.sin...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Hello all, > > I have been using org-mode and particularly org-babel for reproducible > > research. From reading most of the code chunk options in the org manual > > it seems that the follwoing table would be how one would expect output > > in various formats to behave: > > > > | :results value | :exports value | In Buffer | In PDF | Evaluation | > > |----------------+----------------+-----------+--------+------------| > > | silent | results | no | yes | yes | > > | replace/other | none | yes | no | yes | > > | silent | none | no | no | yes | > > > > Perhaps the documentation should be changed to more clearly express that > adding ":results silent" will inhibit insertion of results in the buffer > even during export. > > > > > However from this thread: > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/46625 > > Is there a reason that the solution posted in that thread does not work > for you? > > Best, > > > > > it appears that this is not the case. Is there a way, to get this > > table to be valid out of the box? This might be useful. > > > > Please let me know. > > Thanks and regards, > > > > Shripad > > Tucson, AZ > > -- > Eric Schulte > http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte >
