Thanks Eric!
Shripad Tucson, AZ On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com>wrote: > shripad sinari <shripad.sin...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Hello Eric, > > The posted solution works. But the issue is that I have to do this a lot > of > > times for selective code chunks in multiple documents. Writing the sexp > > each time is not very elegant. > > As the sexp is just elisp you can easily to add a function to your > .emacs configuration which makes this process easier. For example. > > ;; -*- emacs-lisp -*- > (defun exp-only () (if org-current-export-file "replace" "silent")) > > allowing you to then do the following in your Org-mode files > > > #+begin_src sh :results (exp-only) :exports results > echo "I want to see this in HTML/PDF, but not in Org" > #+end_src > > > Besides, if I were to come up with some solution than I did not want > > it to break anything else. > > The above solution will not break anything else. > > > Perhaps my question is still ambiguous and the right question should > > be does value of ":results" plist overrride the one from ":exports", > > i.e., is there any precedence order to the chunk options that is > > implicit, that i have not yet grasped from the documentation? > > > > I don't believe "override" is the right term here, they are orthogonal. > So, ":exports results" does mean that the results will be exported, if > those results are "silent" then while they are run during export, there > nothing is added to the exported document. > > > > > Thanks for your patience and help. > > I hope this does help. One goal of Org-mode's code block support is to > provide as much functionality as possible from a core which is as > composed of a small number of orthogonal working pieces. This maximizes > flexibility and utility with a minimum of maintenance and implementation > overhead. > > Cheers, > > > > > Regards, Shripad. > > > > Shripad > > Tucson, AZ > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> shripad sinari <shripad.sin...@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >> > Hello all, > >> > I have been using org-mode and particularly org-babel for > reproducible > >> > research. From reading most of the code chunk options in the org > manual > >> > it seems that the follwoing table would be how one would expect > output > >> > in various formats to behave: > >> > > >> > | :results value | :exports value | In Buffer | In PDF | Evaluation | > >> > |----------------+----------------+-----------+--------+------------| > >> > | silent | results | no | yes | yes | > >> > | replace/other | none | yes | no | yes | > >> > | silent | none | no | no | yes | > >> > > >> > >> Perhaps the documentation should be changed to more clearly express that > >> adding ":results silent" will inhibit insertion of results in the buffer > >> even during export. > >> > >> > > >> > However from this thread: > >> > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/46625 > >> > >> Is there a reason that the solution posted in that thread does not work > >> for you? > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> > > >> > it appears that this is not the case. Is there a way, to get this > >> > table to be valid out of the box? This might be useful. > >> > > >> > Please let me know. > >> > Thanks and regards, > >> > > >> > Shripad > >> > Tucson, AZ > >> > >> -- > >> Eric Schulte > >> http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte > >> > > -- > Eric Schulte > http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte >
