On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 08:21:01PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: > Rick Frankel writes: > > Missed verbatim. Thanks for the pointer, it works, but i think that > > perl is double-processing returned values. If we do the same things in > > elisp i get (my) expected results: > > > > #+begin_src elisp :results raw > > "|c1|c2| > > |- > > |a|1| > > |b|2|"; > > #+end_src > > Elisp is different from all other languages: it doesn't do any > processing of strings to begin with for value returns. The reason that > Perl processes "raw" results is that org-babel-result-cond does not > switch to the "scalar" path for this condition, which is why you need > the extra "verbatim". It probably should, though, so if Eric agrees > then I will push a change that does this.
I agree. "raw" results should probably be treated as scalar (with cycling of the output to reformat an table :). BTW, I am having problems wrapping my head around verbatim. >From testing, it seems that verbatim acts the same as scalar. rick
