Well, but note that we don't use file URLs -- we have special org hyperlinks with their own syntax...
The reason I am reluctant to adopt tel: is that that would suggest we should adopt the phone number syntax of RFC 3966. I confess that I haven't slogged my way through it, nor am I likely to have time to in the near future.... It seems like false advertising to adopt a scheme without playing by its rules: I'd be happier doing this if I had an RFC 3966-compliant parser to use.... All I have done so far is trust that phone: is followed by something the org-phone-call can deal with. What do you all think? Am I being too fussy? On Apr 16, 2013, at 2:57, Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> wrote: > Michael Strey <mst...@strey.biz> writes: > >> Here is the most important part of Mat's reply: >> >> ,---- >> | note that "tel:" is a common uri for indicating that something is a >> | telephone number (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3966) >> `---- >> >> Seems that we should prefer 'tel' as key for the phone link. > > +1 > -- > : Eric S Fraga, GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D > : in Emacs 24.3.50.1 and Org release_7.9.3f-1199-g3a0e55 >
