Bastien wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>
>> Isn't here the problem that the OP makes a difference between "agenda
>> generation" and "results for a search". I guess he agrees COMMENTed trees
>> should not participate in agendas, but well in regexp searches.
>
> But Samuel *is* using the agenda, no?
I understand from his description:
>>> When I search for a {regexp}, using the agenda, with restriction set to
>>> the current file, I get entries that contain matching text in ordinary
>>> lines and entries that contain matching text in commented lines. This is
>>> desired.
that he's using "C-c a < s" to make his search.
I understand, maybe wrongly though, that he agrees not seeing COMMENTed
headlines in "C-c a a", but not in "C-c a s" results. He'll tell us...
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
