On 8.5.2013, at 00:14, Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Bastien, > > On 5/7/13, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote: >> IMHO this would be too much, since the let-binding solution is there >> already. > > I won't object to whatever decision is made, but it made me curious: > is it not there for inheritance? > > This raises another question. Is it possible to do a let for each of > the built-in views?
Yes, by creating a custom view using the same keys as the built-in view. > > Also, is it possible to do a let for the view that you get when you > RET on a timestamp? No, this is currently not possible. - Carsten > > Samuel > > -- > The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com > > The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. ANYBODY can get > it. >
