On 3 jun. 2013, at 11:54, Michael Strey <mst...@strey.biz> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Just for completeness > > Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > > [...] > >> Possibilities: >> 1. We could change the parser to ignore lists where the first >> item does not start with `1.' or `a)'. But this would >> be a pretty serious change. >> >> 2. We could implement a good function that could find problematic >> cases, so that they can be fixed by hand. This is basically >> what Nick proposed - only it would be implemented in Lisp. >> >> 3. We could implement a function that finds and fixes such issues. >> It would basically scan the buffer and find lists that have >> only a single item, not starting with 1, and change the wrapping >> to fix it. > > 4. Define that lists alway have to have a newline in front of them. > > 5. Define that lists always have to be indented.
Hi Michael, I think this would break too many legacy Org files. It would also cause problems for sublist, so you could no longer make compact deep lists. But thanks for the input. - Carsten > > > My favourite would be 4. > > > Michael Strey > -- > mailto:mst...@strey.biz > http://www.strey.biz
