>> Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com>
>> on Sat, 08 Jun 2013 12:05:32 -0600 wrote:
[...]
>>
>> May be then: org-babel-current-src-block-location?
>>
> How about the shorter `org-babel-current-src-block'? It is somewhat
> more ambiguous, but the only reasonable options would be location or
> name, and not every code block has a name. I think the added brevity is
> worth the ambiguity, but I'm not strongly committed either way.
I personally find it quite confusing. Babel names that contain
src-block semantically refer to the whole thing. This one refers to the
pointer. If brevity is very important I would rather drop "current":
`org-babel-src-block-location'
or probably even more suggestive:
`org-babel-src-block-beginning'.
Vitalie
