Feng Shu <tuma...@gmail.com> writes: > #+LATEX_CLASS: article > #+LATEX_CLASS_NAME: ctexart
I'm not sure this is the right approach. . . I can certainly see the value of generating classes on the fly, though. But somehow the proposed syntax just seems to counter-intuitive. I'm not sure how to overcome this, but perhaps it would be better to allow for an argument to LATEX_CLASS, e.g. (*) #+LATEX_CLASS: myclass :class-name ctexart. as e.g. the INCLUDE command. Of course (*) is somewhat different from how stuff like this is usually handled, cf. e.g. LATEX_CLASS_OPTIONS. –Rasmus -- A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it
