Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Feng Shu <tuma...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> #+LATEX_CLASS: article
>>
>> %%output:
>>
>> \documentclass[11pt]{article}
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> #+LATEX_CLASS: article
>> #+LATEX_CLASS_NAME: ctexart
>>
>> %%output:
>>
>> \documentclass[11pt]{ctexart}
>>
>> ....
>
> Thanks for your patch.
>
> Though, it adds another keyword and another defcustom without providing
> any new functionality. I understand it is a shortcut, but the cons, IMO,
> outweigh the pros : adding a new class to `org-latex-classes' is a bit
> more tedious, but needs to be done only once.
>
> Therefore, unless you convince me this feature brings something new, or
> clearly eases a process, I'll stand on my ground.
Not all the org-mode users are expert of lisp and not all of the org-mode
users are well in English, so finding the variable `org-latex-classes can
customize latex class and adding a lisp block to it may be not a easy
things for many users.
So I expect org-mode can properly export latex without any configure,
but it is impossible for the complexity of tex system. So
reusing exist `org-latex-classes items will become a valuable thing,
it should be implement. My patch is not best way to implement and it can
be deny, but the problem can't be ignore.
1. we can add a function `(defun org-latex-add-deriverd-class (class
exist-class) ...) to menupulate `org-latex-classes
2. My patch's approach.
3. others.
>
>
> Regards,
--
