Comparison is nice. Using pandoc to do org->odt is definitely substandard.
Aric <aorc...@mac.com> writes: > Thank you very much for the upgrade notice. The export to ODT from org-mode > works very well now. There are pluses and minuses it seems between pandoc and > org export. > > Org export -> > 1. Includes figures and tables > 2. Includes pretty code mark-up You can suppress fontification with this variable. C-h v org-odt-fontify-srcblocks > 3. Lacks latex code export Use dvipng or mathtoweb. 1. Dvipng Pro: Less problematic Con: Uses png images of the formulae. 2. MathToWeb Pro: Uses MathML Con: MathToWeb is new kid on the block. May prove to be problematic with more complex formulae. If ltx->mathml conversion is problematic for some equations, you can create "ODF files" (OpenDocumentFormula files created with LibreOffice Math) by hand and insert an Org link to them. > 4. Figure and table references are by section, sort of like old > fashioned latex. But tell me what you yourself want here. I have some ideas on how xrefs can be improved for the section titles. See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-12/msg00585.html I would like to hear what things you desire for xrefs to tables, figures and equations. You were making some remarks about position of captions...