Hi Nick, Nick Dokos <ndo...@gmail.com> writes:
> I find myself more in agreement with Seb than with Bastien here. The > argument that reducing the number of "bad" bindings reduces the chance > of conflicts does not hold water IMO: we will always have to be looking > in the rear-view mirror for some minor mode that will step on us. In the last ten years, we had only *one* such problem while having a dozen of faulty keybindings --- my hope is that, with only a fistful of faulty keybindings, we won't have to look in the rear-view mirror for the next twenty years :) [IOW: I don't buy the all-or-nothing reasoning.] More precisely, I suggest these rebindings: C-c # Checkboxes => C-c C-# C-c , Priorities => C-c C-, C-c ; Comment lines => C-c C-; C-c @ Mark subtree => C-c C-@ (Note they are also accessible through speedy keys.) C-c ~ Cooperation => C-c C-~ (This one I just discovered.) Let's not get trapped in a "buridanesque" decision. :) -- Bastien
