This email resulted from my attempt to reply to an obfuscated email from
the gmane public mailer. I have no idea why it sent my reply to the
list.
As an aside, is there a graceful with these emails in gnus. ( When I do
a wide reply to emails with addresses obfuscated by gmane, I always get
these requests for confirmation.
Matt
Matt Lundin <m...@imapmail.org> writes:
> Gmane Remailer <public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/z...@plane.gmane.org>
> writes:
>
>> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (TMDA).
>>
>> Your message attached below is being held because the address
>> <m...@imapmail.org> has not been verified.
>>
>> To release your message for delivery, please send an empty message
>> to the following address, or use your mailer's "Reply" feature.
>>
>>
>> public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsq-confirm-1393852159.12983.219...@plane.gmane.org
>>
>> This confirmation verifies that your message is legitimate and not
>> junk-mail. You should only have to confirm your address once.
>>
>> If you do not respond to this confirmation request within 14 days,
>> your message will not be delivered.
>>
>> From: Matt Lundin <m...@imapmail.org>
>> Subject: Re: [bug] Incompatible agenda commands
>> To: Bastien <b...@gnu.org>
>> Cc: "Sebastien Vauban"
>> <public-sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/idocf...@plane.gmane.org>,
>> public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/z...@plane.gmane.org
>> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 07:09:04 -0600 (45 minutes, 53 seconds ago)
>> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
>>
>>
>> Bastien <b...@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Sébastien,
>>>
>>> "Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/idocf...@public.gmane.org>
>>> writes:
>>>
>>>> "Sebastien Vauban" wrote:
>>>>> Bastien wrote:
>>>>>> "Sebastien Vauban" writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While a custom agenda command such as the following used to work some
>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>> ago, it does not anymore.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (add-to-list 'org-agenda-custom-commands
>>>>>>> '("D" "Stuck + agenda"
>>>>>>> ((stuck "")
>>>>>>> (agenda ""
>>>>>>> ((org-agenda-span 'week))))) t)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, it seems that the "stuck" block view inhibits any extra view to be
>>>>>>> displayed afterward.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> do I understand correctly that you only get the stuck view and not the
>>>>>> agenda view? If so, I cannot reproduce it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll try to provide you with a reproducible recipe, then.
>>>>
>>>> Add the following line to this ECM:
>>>>
>>>> (setq org-agenda-sticky nil)
>>>>
>>>> and you'll be bitten by that bug!
>>>
>>> Mhh... still can't reproduce the bug. Anyone else?
>>
>> Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce it either. Both the stuck agenda and
>> the weekly agenda display on my end.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>> ----------
