Hi Bastien
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Michael Brand <michael.ch.br...@gmail.com> writes:
>> For me it would be already enough and preferred when the increment
>> would be the same as in the two fields above point.
>
> I pushed a change in master for this --
Thank you for implementing this.
> can you please check it works as expected for you?
Yes it does: SHIFT-RET on the last row of the tables
| 2 |
| 5 |
and
| 2 |
and
| [2014-04-30 Wed] |
| [2014-05-07 Wed] |
and
| [2014-04-30 Wed] |
increment as expected.
As I see only now the use case
| 1.1 |
| -0.5 |
does not seem easy to increment by -1.6 due to the formatting of the
result, so I don't expect it to be implemented. (number-to-string is
not enough because of the inaccuracy of the fraction.)
> (const :tag "Don't increment the value when copying a field" t)))
Wasn't the t meant to be nil?
Michael
