Hi Bastien
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Bastien <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes. There is also `thing-at-point' which does not recognize 1.1 as a
> number... I circumvented this by using `calc-eval'. The above should
> now work correctly.
Yes it does. Using Calc is a nice solution, thank you.
I did not notice before but the first commit
7ac468ff5547891503b6b8f5fa03793d79b3bff6
changed SHIFT-RET on the empty field
| 2 |
| 5 |
| |
to add a new row instead of only replacing the current field.
Michael
