Can't you just do #+begin_src foo :wrap src bar hello world #+end_src
? Best, Ista On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Dror Atariah <dror...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there some change in the status of this issue? Can one now specify the > language of the result? > > Cheers, > Dror > > ---------- > Mahalo Tom, > > It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block. That said, it > would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language > specification. > > Greg > > > On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote: > >> Greg Tucker-Kellogg <address@hidden> writes: >> >>> I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code. I'd like to be able >>> to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed >>> in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot". Using :results value >>> code generates the enclosing SRC block, >>> but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code. Is >>> there a way to specify the coding language >>> of a generated #+RESULTS src block? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Greg >>> >> Aloha Greg, >> >> This works for me with an emacs-lisp code block named harris-matrix that >> generates dot code. >> >> #+header: :var input=harris-matrix >> #+header: :file temp.pdf >> #+header: :cmdline -Tpdf >> #+header: :results output >> #+BEGIN_SRC dot >> $input >> #+END_SRC >> >> It's not quite what you were after, but it might help? >> >> All the best, >> Tom >> >> -- >> Thomas S. Dye >> http://www.tsdye.com