Indeed, this seems to do the trick! Thanks! On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Ista Zahn <istaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can't you just do > > #+begin_src foo :wrap src bar > hello world > #+end_src > > ? > > Best, > Ista > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Dror Atariah <dror...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is there some change in the status of this issue? Can one now specify the > > language of the result? > > > > Cheers, > > Dror > > > > ---------- > > Mahalo Tom, > > > > It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block. That said, > it > > would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language > > specification. > > > > Greg > > > > > > On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote: > > > >> Greg Tucker-Kellogg <address@hidden> writes: > >> > >>> I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code. I'd like to be able > >>> to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed > >>> in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot". Using :results value > >>> code generates the enclosing SRC block, > >>> but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code. Is > >>> there a way to specify the coding language > >>> of a generated #+RESULTS src block? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Greg > >>> > >> Aloha Greg, > >> > >> This works for me with an emacs-lisp code block named harris-matrix that > >> generates dot code. > >> > >> #+header: :var input=harris-matrix > >> #+header: :file temp.pdf > >> #+header: :cmdline -Tpdf > >> #+header: :results output > >> #+BEGIN_SRC dot > >> $input > >> #+END_SRC > >> > >> It's not quite what you were after, but it might help? > >> > >> All the best, > >> Tom > >> > >> -- > >> Thomas S. Dye > >> http://www.tsdye.com >
