Hi Nathaniel On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Nathaniel Flath <flat0...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm fine with adding the (when all log-first-time). I don't want to leave > it unconditional
Ok, then I agree on (when all log-first-time). Michael
Hi Nathaniel On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Nathaniel Flath <flat0...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm fine with adding the (when all log-first-time). I don't want to leave > it unconditional
Ok, then I agree on (when all log-first-time). Michael