Marcin Borkowski <mb...@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes: > Sorry for the noise, it seems to be working now. (I threw out the > code, but AFAIR the non-uniqueness arised with ordinals of /items/ in > different lists.)
Yes, ordinals for items are relative to the list they belong to. OTOH for plain lists, this is the sequence number among other plain lists in the buffer (see docstring). Regards,
