On 2014-11-10, at 00:08, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Marcin Borkowski <mb...@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes: > >> Sorry for the noise, it seems to be working now. (I threw out the >> code, but AFAIR the non-uniqueness arised with ordinals of /items/ in >> different lists.) > > Yes, ordinals for items are relative to the list they belong to. OTOH > for plain lists, this is the sequence number among other plain lists in > the buffer (see docstring).
That's exactly what I thought. (I need ordinals for plain lists, since I sometimes convert them to groups of radio buttons in my derived html backend; at first, I mistakenly took ordinals of items...) Tip to myself (and to whoever might need it): to have a unique id of a list item, combine the id of the parent list with the (relative) id of the item. > Regards, Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University
