Hello, Richard Lawrence <richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu> writes:
> As I mentioned in the earlier thread, I think the Pandoc syntax is a > good place to start, and I think it would be valuable to have the two > syntaxes be compatible. But even Pandoc's citation syntax might not be > general enough to satisfy everyone's needs, so the first step for > introducing citation syntax to Org should be compiling a list of all the > things such a syntax should represent. See also <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/72446> BTW, I agree that a dedicated syntax is needed, but we failed to find one so far. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
