Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: > So (citation ⋯ :parts ((part ⋯) (part ⋯))). Fine with me. Other > possibilities are citation/entry and :entries. Or less nice: > citation/cite and :cites.
I don't mind using :entries and `entry' either. I'll update "wip-cite" in a few days. > It would enable "complicated argument [@k1;@k2;@k3]", which is pretty > nice. There's still no pre and post notes etc, only keys. Shortcuts are simple citations that ought to be available in most back-ends. I don't see your example as a particularly straightforward one. I suggest to use [(cite):@k1;@k2;@k3] Note that your example doesn't even provide an in-text equivalent while [@k1] has @k1. Regards,
