Nicolas Goaziou <[email protected]> writes:
> I'd rather have a single syntax for keys.
Me to.
> Since this one is not much more intrusive than the previous one, we
> could as well drop @key in favor of @{key}.
It seems like a moderately dear price to pay for everyone with "normal"
citation keys... It's better than @key-with-',?.'{}.
How about other citations? Are we talking the wholesale solution:
[cite: @{key}]
[(cite): @{key}]
[@{key}]
Otherwise, I don't see how we have come closer to one syntax from a user
point of view. And I don't like the above.
—Rasmus
--
Vote for proprietary math!
