On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:18 AM, Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 10 Mar 2015 at 09:50, Rasmus wrote:
> > Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> >> Since this one is not much more intrusive than the previous one, we
> >> could as well drop @key in favor of @{key}.
> >
> > It seems like a moderately dear price to pay for everyone with "normal"
> > citation keys... It's better than @key-with-',?.'{}.
>
> I agree. I would rather type @key >90% of the time instead of
> @{key}. For me, the alternative is more than a moderately high price to
> pay!
>
> If we don't want a proliferation of alternative syntax, maybe we need to
> impose the restriction already suggested of not allowing punctuation at
> the end of a key. Solve the problem upstream... and not have the tail
> wag the dog!
>
> But, of course, don't let this tail (me) wag the dog (the rest of you)
> should the consensus be that the design is cleaner with @{key}. I'll
> manage! :)
>
> Thanks,
> eric
>
I also think a simpler key syntax will make htis much nmore usable.
Citations are in general somewhat distracting from the writing process;
every additional keystroke is gong to add to that distraction. This is
true even if hand-added citations are likely to be the exception rather
than the norm.
>
> --
> : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.50.1, Org
> release_8.3beta-843-ga5f1a3.dirty
>
>
