2015-03-27 7:57 GMT+01:00 Cecil Westerhof <[email protected]>:
> 2015-03-26 23:19 GMT+01:00 Cecil Westerhof <[email protected]>:
>
>> 2015-03-26 22:49 GMT+01:00 Nick Dokos <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> Cecil Westerhof <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>> > In this way I do not get an empty column. It would be better when K
>>> > would put between and below H and I, but I think I can live with it.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Just put I after K and the subgraph.
>>>
>>
>> That works. It is even better when I put both H and I after it.
>>
>> I also found a way to get resources at the correct place.
>>
>
> I changed to a digraph:
> #+BEGIN_SRC dot :file test.png :cmdline -Kdot -Tpng
> digraph {
> A
> B
> C
> utilities [label = "Utility's"]
>
> D
> E
> F [shape = rectangle]
>
>
> subgraph cluster_resources {
> color=blue
> resources [label = "Resources"]
> }
>
> G
> G_ [style="invisible"]
>
> K
> subgraph cluster_ta {
> color=blue
> {rank = same; L, M}
> L
> M
> }
> H
> I
>
> {rank = same; D, E, F}
> {rank = same; G_, K}
>
>
> A -> F
> B -> F
> C -> F
> A -> D
> utilities -> resources [style="invisible"]
>
> E -> F
>
> F -> K [dir = back]
> F -> G [dir = back]
> F -> H [dir = back]
> F -> I [dir = back]
>
> G -> G_ [style="invisible"]
>
> K -> L
> K -> M
> L -> M
> }
> #+END_SRC
>
> There is only one problem: I see the arrowhead with:
> utilities -> resources
> and:
> 'G -> G_'
>
> Is there a way to get rid of those?
>
I found that also:
[style="invisible", arrowhead = "none"]
--
Cecil Westerhof
