On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> wrote: > Marcin Borkowski <mb...@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes: > > > On 2015-04-06, at 13:40, Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> wrote: > > > >> Jude DaShiell <jdash...@panix.com> writes: > >> > >>> http://www.adobe.com/accessibility/products.html > >>> is a good place to start. > >> > >> It's a list of a bunch of software packages of which most are not (i) > free > >> in any meaning of the word; and (ii) supported on GNU/Linux. > > > > So what? IIUC, the OP wants to have something similar using Emacs and > > (maybe) free (in a usual sense, or in FSF sense) software. Isn't it > > a valid request? > > Of course it is, but OP is referring to features of some software that I > don't have access to, so how am I supposed to make sense of it? I'm not > going to (i) install a new OS; and (ii) buy/torrent software to understand > and test a feature in named software. > > If there's a standard I'm eager to hear about it. > > I believe the relevant standard is PDF/UA
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=PDF/UA As far as I can tell, support for this from LaTeX is still very much a work in progress, but there is an accessibility.sty package that has made a start. Here is a recent SO discussion: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/124291/revisiting-producing-structured-pdfs-from-latex Will -- Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Morelia
