Rasmus <[email protected]> writes:
> While we have opening and closing tags for formatting (e.g. bold), I
> dislike the above. It seems like asking for trouble; it would seem one
> could easily loose track and delete one end of the tag and not the other.
> IOW: [@:ID1]... [@:ID2]...[@]...[@] seems like asking for trouble as I
> could easily delete an opening pair.
We can implement a function in org-annotate.el to remove an annotation.
You don't need to do it by hand.
> But note that I am more interested in an inline noting/todo functionality
> as opposed to annotation functionality.
Inline noting is
Text[@:1][@]
* Annotations
[@:1:] My note.
I don't know what is a TODO functionality since you suggest to not make
it appear in the agenda.
> Also, for annotation, would it not be annoying, in review session say, to
> have the notes so "far away" from the text? Perhaps not with the right
> helping tools.
Again, not with proper tooling, e.g, remote editing like footnotes.
Regards,
