Nicolas Goaziou <[email protected]> writes:
>> Fine whit me. For that I I have inlinetasks.
>
> Then it cannot even replace inlinetasks.
Is that a goal?
>> Its virtues are compactness, being similar to a list, being C-k friendly,
>> and, IMO, more intuitive.
>
> But, IMO, totally useless for general annotations.
I think "totally useless" stretching it. Two examples.
[@:1] My sentence on foo [@] and something else
* Annotations
[@:1:Nicolas] Remember to refer to bar
#+TODO: Notes/Nicolas
My sentence on foo [Notes/Nicolas: Remember to refer to bar] and
something else.
The latter is less precise, but I would still prefer it. I guess you
could add references to an endnote for long notes, which would bring it
closer to killing org-inlinetasks.
> This probably means they shouldn't share the same syntax. Note I'm all
> for replacing inlinetasks with something else (i.e., change syntax),
> albeit this is no simple task.
I don't particularly care for them either.
—Rasmus
--
This space is left intentionally blank
