On 2015-06-05 Fri 14:27, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Titus von der Malsburg <malsb...@posteo.de> writes: > >> Below is a list of things that I tested. This list of test cases is >> probably not exhaustive. > > Thanks. > >> Things that don't work with \verb (produce malformed LaTeX): >> >> #+TITLE: ~test~ >> >> #+CAPTION: ~test~ >> [[/tmp/img.png]] >> >> * ~test~ >> ** ~test~ >> …
Thee can be handled by protectedtexttt. The obvious questions is of
course: Wouldn’t it be more consistent to handle all instances of ~code~
using protectedtexttt? And if you want to support the use of \verb at
all, shouldn’t that be done via =verbatim= not ~code~?
>> These two did not produce the intended results (sub and super script
>> don’t work) but the LaTeX is not malformed:
>>
>> test^~test~
>> test_~test~
This really seems to be an independent issue (because test^*test*
doesn’t work either) but I think it should produce this LaTeX:
test\(^{\text{\texttt{test}}}\)
test\(_{\text{\texttt{test}}}\)
But this works, too:
test\(^{\text{\verb~test~}}\)
test\(_{\text{\verb~test~}}\)
Titus
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
