Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 09:28:12AM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> Titus von der Malsburg <malsb...@posteo.de> writes: >> >> > Thee can be handled by protectedtexttt. The obvious questions is of >> > course: Wouldn’t it be more consistent to handle all instances of ~code~ >> > using protectedtexttt? >> >> One option would be indeed to remove \verb altogether. Note that it is >> also used in inline source blocks. >> >> However, I assume \verb put less limitations than \texttt on its >> contents, so I'd rather keep \verb around. > > This TeX.SX post discourages the use of \verb. > > http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/83894/4416 > > It cites the following FAQ from UK TeX. > > http://www.TeX.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=verbwithin > > Maybe it is worth to consider dropping \verb entirely?
Done in b8ade2e79e92dad10f2b045bc55fbeaf133e5598. Thanks to you both. Regards,