Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 09:28:12AM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> Titus von der Malsburg <malsb...@posteo.de> writes:
>> 
>> > Thee can be handled by protectedtexttt.  The obvious questions is of
>> > course: Wouldn’t it be more consistent to handle all instances of ~code~
>> > using protectedtexttt?
>> 
>> One option would be indeed to remove \verb altogether. Note that it is
>> also used in inline source blocks. 
>> 
>> However, I assume \verb put less limitations than \texttt on its
>> contents, so I'd rather keep \verb around.
>
> This TeX.SX post discourages the use of \verb.
>
>   http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/83894/4416
>
> It cites the following FAQ from UK TeX.
>
>   http://www.TeX.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=verbwithin
>
> Maybe it is worth to consider dropping \verb entirely?

Done in b8ade2e79e92dad10f2b045bc55fbeaf133e5598. Thanks to you both.


Regards,

Reply via email to