On 2015-07-27, at 11:46, Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> wrote: > On Monday, 27 Jul 2015 at 11:05, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > > [...] > >> Frankly speaking, I'm rather astonished at your and Eric's answers. >> I treated my question as a formality, and expected answers like "Of >> course you can do it, don't be silly." > > Oh, sorry! I thought you actually did want to get some feedback on > this. I'm not bothered at all what you do with your code ;-).
;-) Well, I did want that. I just didn't expect this... > Some of us, for better or for worse, have lived through the whole > development of "open source", "free software", "public domain". I > release my first software as "pd" back in the late 70s! Back then, the > main worry was about implied warranties and not software > freedom. Different world... I guess. > And, by the way, copyright and licensing are two completely different > issues (in response to an earlier email of yours in this thread)... True. I should have said (probably) "intellectual property law". Notice how the very name contains a lie: there is no such thing as "intellectual property", since "intellectual" things are not material and thus cannot be a "property" at all. And now I have another question, but I'll put in in a separate thread, I guess. > cheers, > eric Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University