> > Please explain why 1) is more readable than 2): > > > 1) ;; Use U+2014 (EM DASH) to underline if possible, else U+002D > > (HYPHEN-MINUS) > > (if (char-displayable-p ?-) ?- ?-))) > > > 2) (if (char-displayable-p ?\u2014) ?\u2014 ?-))) > > Check the current code. It's a mix of the two. > I changed it not because of any web server/client issue, but > simply because the resulting code is more readable.
Yes, thank you. That's in fact what I meant. It helps that the two characters appear different, and the comment makes it clear what the intention is. _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
