Pete Forman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm also getting "Symbol's function definition is void: process- > coding-system". Is this fixed yet? Yes, it checks if the function is bound and uses `stty -onlcr' if it isn't. kai -- Beware of flying birch trees.
- rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Kai Großjohann
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Daniel Pittman
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Pete Forman
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Daniel Pittman
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Pete Forman
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Daniel Pittman
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Pete Forman
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Kai Großjohann
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Pete Forman
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Kai Großjohann
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Pete Forman
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Kai Großjohann
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Kai Großjohann
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Stefan Monnier
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Pete Forman
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Kai Großjohann
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Stefan Monnier
- Re: rcp.el, XEmacs and colons Kai Großjohann