"Edward J. Sabol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] I guess we don't really have to worry about '-nt' working > after all. Damn, and I already did the work to check it :-) But at least I can skip the work of trying to do it with `find'. So, if anybody finds that `test foo -nt bar' isn't working, please holler and I'll see what I can do about that `find' thing. kai -- Beware of flying birch trees.
- cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.el,1.322,1.323' Kai Grossjohann
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.el,1.322,1.323' Stefan Monnier
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.el,1.322,1.323' Kai Großjohann
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.el,1.322,1.323' Edward J. Sabol
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.el,1.322,1.32... Kai Großjohann
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.el,1.322... Edward J. Sabol
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.el,1... Kai Großjohann
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.... Pete Forman
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.... Kai Großjohann
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.... Pete Forman
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.... Kai Großjohann
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.el,1.322... Francesco Potorti`
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.el,1... Pete Forman
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.... Pete Forman
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.... Kai Großjohann
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.... Pete Forman
- Re: cvs ci 'rcp/lisp rcp.... Kai Großjohann