Arsen Arsenović <ar...@aarsen.me> writes: > Jens Schmidt <jschmidt4...@vodafonemail.de> writes: > >> Moving to tangents ... please CC me. >> >> On 2023-11-22 04:32, Arsen Arsenović wrote: >> >>>> Should we suggest that the Bash developer add a feature to handle this >>>> case (multiple shells in parallel) the "right" way? If many users >>>> would like it, that could make it worth building in. >>> >>> That would be very nice. This issue has almost been prolific enough to >>> force me to switch shells. >> >> This Bash-bashing made me curious, as I do not remember having issues >> with loss of its history, ever. > > I do not partake in bash-bashing enthusiastically. I'm a big fan of > readline and appreciate how reliable bash is. > >> And that without such tricks as using an ever growing history file. I >> just use "shopt -s histappend" and 4096 lines as HISTFILESIZE. Plus I >> close my Bashes orderly before shutting down. Plus I do not use Bash >> from Emacs, only in "real" terminals. Eh, plus I rarely use nested >> Bashes. >> >> So given all that, is there a reproducer for this? > > Unfortunately, I have been unable to produce a decent set of > reproduction steps. This issue happens (relatively) infrequently and > inexplicably on my machines. It pains me to complain without solid > information. > > I also have shopt -s histappend set. > > I suspect that something starts a bash process and does not set > histappend (--norc?), leading bash to override history.
I've always suspected TRAMP of this. --- via emacs-tangents mailing list (https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents)
