Richard Stallman <r...@gnu.org> writes: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > > > So the commands of Basb process A and those of Basb process B would be > > > interspersed in the history? And as you go forward and back in the > > > history in Bash process B, you would see A's commands and B's commands > > > in chronological order? > > > Yes. ZSH does implement this well IME (but I haven't used ZSH > > extensively.. so I'm not sure if I'd run into trouble with it). > > > > That makes a kind of sense, but what I would envision is that each > > > Bash process has its own history with only the commands of that process. > > > Some do prefer that. It'd be reasonable to do that by default, as it's > > currently the default. > > It seems fine to support both modes and let each user choose.
I agree. -- Arsen Arsenović
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- via emacs-tangents mailing list (https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-tangents)