(Sorry for the late reply.) andrea <andrea.crott...@gmail.com> writes:
> Now the parsing date function is the one defined in xml-rpc, and that > date looks like when I actually published that. > What could that be? This is strange. It looks like the date parsing function is getting re-defined somehow. I'm about to push a new version of xml-rpc.el with a report-bug function so that I can get all the relevant information. Could you grab that version (after I let you know that I've made it available) and, if you can still produce the problem, use the report-bug function to report it again? Thanks, Mark. -- http://hexmode.com/ The only alternative to Tradition is bad tradition. — Jaraslov Pelikan _______________________________________________ Emacsweblogs mailing list Emacsweblogs@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacsweblogs
