On 2010-01-25, at 09:16 , Ian Eiloart wrote: > > Lets not lose sight of the fact that IMAP servers supports two styles of > threading "Subject" or "References". These determine the order in which > messages are sorted, but not the manner in which they're displayed.
Since we're going to need to implement client threading anyway, I don't think we ever care what the server offers. > I have a question: is it possible to supplement JWZ threading with Subject > threading, or are they strict alternatives? I don't see a problem. I'd like to use jwz threads and split them on clear subject changes (either explicit via =~ /\(was\b/, or hijacked, tentatively !~ /\bRE:/i) I think gus only has flat threading in mind for 1.0 though. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
