At 23:38 -0800 on 24/01/2010, Faisal N Jawdat wrote: >On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Gus Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: >> It's 10.6 only. 10.7 if it's out before Letters. > >I'd like to make a case for not actually forcing people to the latest >and greatest OS. I know of several power user types who haven't jumped >to SL because they are mid-project and loathe to take on a major OS >update at the moment.
Aside from that, I'd like to know what the compelling argument for 10.6-only support *is*, other than "it simplifies things". Because presumably we aren't going to be dropping support for the previous OS version as soon as a new version ships going forward. I'm not trying to say we should support 10.4, *ever*, but if we get this thing out the door and 10.5 is still current-minus-one, I'd like to know why, exactly, we're going to force people to upgrade to 10.6. That seems...unfriendly. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
