On 29/gen/2010, at 02.47, LuKreme wrote:
> On 28-Jan-2010, at 18:24, John C. Welch wrote: >> >> Indeed. So rather than trying to make it hard to get to, instead, meet the >> challenge head on, and give people a solid *subset* of HTML so they can have >> better formatting and control. If you give them 90% of what they will use >> right there, no arguing, the other 10% they don't have is forgivable. > > This is one of the reasons I like the idea of having an option for markdown > to be translated to html. The fact is that HTML messages can be quite useful. > Adam Engst @ TidBITS does html messages right, though it took me a couple of > years to get over my antipathy for HTML emails and learn this. A huge +1 for this! :) I think that the best choice for 1.0 will be "HTML done well" by default for one kind of power users (SemanticTextPowerUser, STPU) *PLUS* "Text done well" as a configuration for another kind of power users (TextPowerUser, TPU). I'm a STPU. I often format mails with good legibility formatting, titles, subtitles. I sometimes even use inline images to describe steps and detail informations. My wishlist for this will be a way to set H1, H2, H3, strong, em, and links. That could mean markdown converted to HTML, if you want to. :) HTML done well, please. :) |D _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
