On Jan 29, 2010, at 10:19 AM, John C. Welch wrote: > > Yes. Even if it completely mangles the message. Then it's the OTHER guy's > fault for not sending everything in 9 point geneva
I really don't think you're getting this, John (though to be fair, I'm not sure Xavier got it either). What was originally being suggested is that the HTML *composer* not offer a choice of font, so that whatever the recipient has set as his "default font" is used, on the theory that what they have set as default is whatever they'd most like to see. Thus, there's no possibility of mangling any sent messages. What it looks like Xavier thought was being suggested was overriding the sender's font choice when *reading* HTML mail, on the theory that what you have set as your default font is what you'd most like to see, and other people send awful mangled HTML mail with terrible fonts. This is a useful option (and exists in Mail), but personally, I wouldn't like to see it as the default. No one is suggesting trying to send any kind of mangled message, or blame anyone for sending anything in any given font. Timothy Collett -- He who asks is a fool for five minues. He who doesn't ask is a fool forever.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list List help: http://lists.ranchero.com/listinfo.cgi/email-init-ranchero.com
