[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >More RAM is >always better, but it's not absolutely necessary to have 512 to run OS X. Well, if you're bent on that way, what can I do? Who asked for absolutely necessary? What about top performance on old hardware? My advice can be summed up as: "If you're going to spend on RAM to run OS X, go all the way beyond Apples old ratings and at least to 512 MB. "
384 may be usable, but 512 is more fun! >Besides, why would I fire up all those and leave them running for a >week???? That was a typical work week for a friend of mine. She uses 1.5 GB on a 800 mhz G4 and, man, does it smoke. I never reboot my OS X machines myself. ___________________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe send a mail message with a SUBJECT line of "unsubscribe" to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
