> > 2) Convince the authors of the affected header files to change the
> > license to LGPL. The source files can still be GPL2 with LGPL headers.
> > This has a number of political considerations and affects quite a few
> > header files.
In layman's terms what is the difference and why one over the other?
Without knowing the difference it would seem that if we could let a
closed source use our open source software without giving them
control over it would be a good thing.
What is the danger of having header files LGPL but the rest GPL2?
I'm not looking to start a fight just interested.
Chris Morley
_________________________________________________________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
